<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Like Darcs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kfahlgren.com/blog/2006/04/30/why-i-like-darcs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kfahlgren.com/blog/2006/04/30/why-i-like-darcs/</link>
	<description>Keith on XML, Publishing, Ruby, Birds, &#038; San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Horst Gutmann</title>
		<link>http://kfahlgren.com/blog/2006/04/30/why-i-like-darcs/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Horst Gutmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 12:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kfahlgren.com/blog/?p=13#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hi :)

You can start your own svn repository by simply doing a svnadmin create /path/to/your/repo :) You only need super-user privileges if you want to create that repository somewhere, where your user has no write-rights :)

You&#039;re 2nd problem with svn could be solved in combination with svk.

The 3rd problem is from what I understand directly related to how darcs and svn work. Darcs is patch based without a strict versioning number. If a patch depends on another, so be it. If not, then you can skip it. SVN has a strict version numbering, so to translate it to patches: Every patch depends on all other patches that were committed before it. Matter of taste in my opinion, what is better :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi :)</p>
<p>You can start your own svn repository by simply doing a svnadmin create /path/to/your/repo :) You only need super-user privileges if you want to create that repository somewhere, where your user has no write-rights :)</p>
<p>You&#8217;re 2nd problem with svn could be solved in combination with svk.</p>
<p>The 3rd problem is from what I understand directly related to how darcs and svn work. Darcs is patch based without a strict versioning number. If a patch depends on another, so be it. If not, then you can skip it. SVN has a strict version numbering, so to translate it to patches: Every patch depends on all other patches that were committed before it. Matter of taste in my opinion, what is better :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
